Conceptualizing the FSD hierarchy
01/12/2011 at 12:04 am | Posted in Uncategorized | 8 CommentsTags: female sexual dysfunction, Feminism, FSD, health, language, medicine, pain, picture post, sexual dysfunction, sexual health, social construction
A couple of times on this blog, I and guest posters have briefly mentioned something called the female sexual dysfunction hierarchy. This is an idea that formed in my mind while reading various interpretations of female sexual dysfunction – I noticed that not all forms of FSD were handled equally in terms of social (and professional) acceptance and priority for treatments. But what is the FSD hierarchy, exactly? What do we mean when we talk about it? Let’s think about it and see what we can come up with.
To me, the FSD hierarchy means that certain types of sexual problems are more readily recognized as sexual dysfunctions than others, and are given a higher priority for treatment by doctors and therapists. It means that if you have some sexual dysfunctions that are not recognized as serious and real you’re more likely to have to present some reason, a justification, for the dysfunction to exist in the first place and you may face barriers to satisfactory resolution. Conversely, the FSD hierarchy means that other types of sexual dysfunctions are more readily recognized as valid health problems for which medical treatment (and insurance reimbursement) is more likely to be available and socially acceptable.
It’s not that all forms of FSD can or should be treated with a single magic bullet. Different types of FSD need different treatment options, including the option to not treat at all. A woman with low libido may not require a pain management program and a woman dealing with orgasm difficulties may already have an otherwise high sex drive. However, what the hierarchy does is prioritize some women’s personal experiences and feelings with regard to sexual dysfunction, but it dismisses others.
Basically you get shit about having certain types of FSD but not others. The hierarchy does not necessarily mean that women with any form of FSD will be treated the way as they should be – that is, with respect and dignity.
Ultimately, I think it means that some sexual dysfunctions are “Okay” to have and treat, while others are not okay to have or to view as dysfunctions, regardless of how much a sexual problem is interfering with your life. I believe that a hierarchy of FSD is something that both medicine and social construction contribute to.
And I don’t like it. No sir, I don’t like it.
I hate the hierarchy of sexual dysfunction. It isn’t fair. It’s artificial and hegemonic; it compartmentalizes different types of sexual dysfunction, so you lose a chance explore overlap. Coupled with the stigma of having FSD in the first place, keeps women with sexual problems broadly from sharing experiences with one another. Unfortunately the hierarchy of FSD in and of itself adds to the stigma – since some kinds of FSD aren’t valid in the first place, it’s hip to make fun of anyone who thinks they have sex problems.
Medicine is rigid in defining what is recognized as FSD. Generally, under the medical model of FSD, (hotly contested and informed by the DSM) there are four broad categories of sexual dysfunction – pain, lack of arousal, lack of orgasm/pleasure, and/or a low or absent libido (sexual desire.) To this day, as evidenced by the JAMA study citing a 43% prevalence rate of FSD in the US, a sexual problem may be considered to cross the threshold into “Dysfunction” regardless of the feedback of the individual. To ignore a patient’s personal feelings is a problem in and of itself, for it’s fairly common to experience snafu sexually from time to time. And even if you do experience what might be considered a “Problem,” if you are comfortable with that, then it’s less of a problem in the first place.
The social construction model, particularly the New View model of women’s sexuality, is looser in recognizing sexual problems and their causes, but stricter in defining limits for the term dysfunction. Stricter limits on the use of the term sexual dysfunction are called for because of a long history of abuse at the hands of those who had the authority to dispense with such terminology in the past. Additionally, sexual dysfunction is stigmatized and so a diagnosis of FSD can in and of itself create anxiety – you lose your status as a “Normal” person, sexually. (If you ask me, it makes more sense to take out the sting of sexual dysfunction in the first place rather than to elevate TAB status to its position of privilege. There’s nothing wrong with having a sexual problem, so, what’s wrong with having sexual dysfunction?)
Here’s a picture of what I think the FSD hierarchy looks like. I whipped this up in Excel so the graphic is Butt-Ugly. My hierarchy is based on the four broad medical categories of FSD, because that’s how I most often see sexual dysfunction talked about. That medical model of sexual dysfunction certainly does have a long reach. What does the FSD hierarchy mean to you, and how would you describe it?
[Description: The sexual dysfunction hierarchy pyramid, version 1.0. A 4-tier pyramid sitting on top of a brown rectangle. Each tier in the pyramid is a different color and labeled, in descending order, “Pain,” “lack of arousal,” “lack of pleasure/orgasm,” and “low/absent libido.” Caption next to the pain tier says, “Pain is generally recognized as valid. May be considered a pain condition, disability and/or sexual dysfunction (depending on the individual with pain and who you ask about it).” Caption next to the lack of arousal tier says, “can sometimes be a problem may be addressed with lubricants or medications ED in cis men usually recognized more readily”. Caption next to the lack of pleasure/orgasm tier says, “Starting to get controversial as sexual dysfunctions now since these problems may be social, physiological or both”. Caption next to the low/absent sexual desire tier says, “The illegitimate child of FSD Desire, libido, HSDD – all highly contested Is it a dysfunction or just part of your personality?”. The rectangle under the pyramid is supposed to represent underground and it’s labeled “PGAD, Endometriosis, Overlap and Intersectonality, Stuff I forgot about, Interstitial Cystitis and Stuff I hadn’t thought of.”] Caption next to the rectangle says, “Stuff underneath the pyramid Doesn’t get talked about much”.
Under both the medical and social construction models of sexual dysfunction, pain is generally recognized as valid problem that cannot always be explained away. It is the sexual problem for which medical intervention is the most acceptable, relatively speaking. Even Dr. Leonore Tiefer, proponent of the social construction model of sexuality, who organized the New View Campaign, has stated that sexual pain is the one and only valid and important sexual dysfunction – at least so long as we continue to use that terminology. Pain might be due to a vulvar pain condition like vulvodynia or vaginismus, or it might be part & parcel of another chronic health condition. It may be exclusively limited to sexual situations.
I’ve noticed that since pain is more readily recognized as a medical problem and a sexual dysfunction, it’s treated funny in discussions of FSD. Even though pain falls under the broad umbrella term of FSD, it’s frequently ignored or gets at best one-line mention in an article. So there’s a poor exploration of overlap between pain + other sexual problems. And as someone with sexual pain problems, I can’t ignore the way that other non-painful forms of FSD are discussed; the way sexual medicine is stigmatized – that’s a lot of stigma to get over, when you need to reach out to a medical professional for help. The take-away message stuck in my mind is, “Of course HER distress is palpable and important – she’s in physical pain! HER sexual problem is okay to treat with a pill or whatever, but YOURS isn’t. Why are you so worried about anything other than pain, anyway?” It is as though the distress I feel from experiencing pain with sex is more legitimate than the distress that another woman feels from lack of orgasm, or whatever else.
Even though sexual pain may be treated with relative respect in discussions of sexual dysfunction, the reality remains that it’s still viewed as a joke. Write frankly about dyspareunia and you may find trolls come out of their dark hiding places. In real life sexual pain gets no special treatment.
(For the record, I know that I talk about sexual pain with more detail than I do other types of sexual dysfunction on this blog. This is not because I think other forms of sexual dysfunction are unimportant – it’s because I have the most experience with sexual pain.)
I placed arousal problems on the second tier. This can be a problem because a lack of arousal in and of itself can contribute to physical discomfort with vaginal insertions of objects say, if you are not producing sufficient lubrication. I’ve found that a little lubrication can also make vulvar stimulation more comfortable with a partner. I also placed this one second on the hiearachy chart because there are sex toys and some medical tools (I’m thinking of vacuum pumps and lubricants) available for women with arousal difficulties. (There’s also that Zestra thing that’s been going around stirring up double-standards in advertisements controversy too but I don’t know how effective it really is.) This is also where erectile dysfunction would go, as the presence of an erection is not necessarily the same as the presence of sexual desire (a distinction which in and of itself can be difficult to come to terms with.)
I placed lack of orgasm and/or sexual pleasure on the third tier, in orange. Things are really starting to get messy & controversial now. There’s sort of a medical treatment available for this (the Orgasmatron spinal cord stimulator) but it’s heavily sensationalized and it may not even work well.
And orgasm itself can be controversial – How much should an expert and an individual emphasize the importance of orgasm? Does emphasis on sexual pleasure create pressure to have an orgasm? What if you’ve tried everything and it’s just not happening? What if the reason you cannot orgasm is because of poor sex education; because no one ever showed you or your partner how? What about if you were previously orgasmic and subsequently developed difficulties orgasming – say, from an injury, antidepressant use, or something else? If you are having difficulty with orgasm because of a medical problem then should that be recognized as a sexual dysfunction in and of itself or as a symptom of something else?
The fourth tier is the one that sets off alarm bells most frequently. When the media covers sexual dysfunction, this is usually what journalists are talking about and what sexologists respond to – low or absent sexual desire. It’s very controversial as far as sexual dysfunction goes – How are we defining low sexual desire, what is the measuring stick? Could a low or absent sexual desire be part of your personality or sexual orientation (asexuality) and, if so, how do we make that distinction? What terminology should we use; should we call it a sexual dysfunction or a sexual problem? Does it have a cause and if so, what is that cause; are you stressed out or have you started on a new medication? If not, then have you stopped to consider social construction arguments to explain a drop in libido? Could low libido ever be more than one of the above or possibly all of the above?
In terms of the FSD hierarchy, this is the dysfunction that is most socially unacceptable to have (or at least to publicly disclose) and certainly the least acceptable one to seek medical treatment for. The New View Campaign’s activism during buildup to the flibanserin hearings explicitly stated, “Low sexual desire is not a disease.” This is a theme repeated throughout Sex is Not a Natural Act and A New View of Women’s Sexual Problems.
However, somewhat paradoxically, it may be acceptable to have low or absent sexual desire – so long as we don’t call it a dysfunction and so long as we avoid medical options to address it.
And then there’s the fifth tier, which isn’t even part of the pyramid. I put it underneath the pyramid, underground – because it contains stuff related to sexual dysfunction that rarely gets discussed. This is where stuff that gets swept under the rug goes. It’s where alternative views of sexual problems and dysfunctions are – brigid wrote about this in her guest post, On the FSD hierarchy and why it hurts all of us – here, she discussed endometriosis and the lack of discussion about how it impacts sexual functioning, and she said, “By silencing other women who suffer from FSD just because it doesn’t fall under one individual’s narrow view of what fsd is and how it works, we are hurting every woman who needs help.” Another example would be an alternative interpretation of sexual pain proposed by a co-author of Secret Suffering – that sexual pain can also mean pain in the sex organs.
This is where interstitial cystitis wound up when MTV ran the True Life episode, I Can’t Have Sex. One of the participants of the program, Tali, has IC and IC activisim is an important part of her life. So one of the criticisms with the True Life episode (and this is in no way Tali’s fault,) is that it did not even mention the words, “Interstitial cystitis;” instead the episode focused exclusively on sexual pain. It’s related, but not a purely sexual topic.
And underground, off the pyramid, is where overlapping issues go – for example, to have both sexual pain and a low libido. These two topics may very well be related – it’s possible to experience a drop in sexual interest due to sexual pain; I’ve also seen it suggested that women who have sex with a low libido may experience sexual pain. But what happens when one problem or another resolve? What happens when you find a way to address sexual pain but your libido does not rebound?
And underground is where intersectional issues go – to have a sexual dysfunction and be any sexual orientation other than straight; to be a woman of color with sexual dysfunction; to be a trans person with sexual dysfunction; to have a disability + a sexual dysfunction (which in and of itself may be another disability;) to be kinky yet sexually dysfunctional. (All topics which I’d like to see covered on this blog in 2011 – hint, hint.) Part of the reason I started this blog is because I felt like there weren’t a lot of good resources available specifically for folks with sexual dysfunction. Why would there be such resources, after all, if sexual dysfunction isn’t a real thing: If it isn’t real, then there’s no need for such resources and support – just use whatever anyone else is using. That ought to be good enough, right?
But then I was thinking to myself, this is the way that I’ve seen discussions of sexual dysfunction go in online interactions… but what drives these discussions in the first place? Usually, it’s media coverage. And the media prioritizes coverage of sexual dysfunctions differently than what’s shown here.
So here’s a different model of the way sexual dysfunction discussions might be pictured, as driven by the media:
[Description: another multi-colored 4-tier pyramid graphic, this one inverted so the narrowest point is at the bottom. Labeled The Media and sexual dysfunction pyramid V. 1.0. Representing how the media covers sexual dysfunctions and problems. On the top is “BONERS,” second tier is “Libido,” third tier is “Orgasm” and the bottom tier is “Pain.”]
And here’s an explanation of this pyramid:
1. BONERS – (inspired by Sady Doyle of Tiger Beatdown.) It’s okay to show commercials for erectile dysfunction but not a commercial for Zestra, which supposedly acts on sexual arousal in women. BONERS may or may not be equivalent to libido and orgasm.
2. Libido – after getting past all the commercials and in-print advertisements for Cialis and Viagra you might find yourself reading an article about some other such medication that’s supposed to increase libido or about relationship tweaks you can supposedly make to get more satisfaction.
3. Orgasm – then you may see some advice columns talking about figuring out ways to have an orgasm.
4. Then sometimes sporadically there’ll be an article somewhere about sexual pain.
Not pictured: My total lack of effort in making this graphic and my own amusement in using the word “BONERS” in a graphic on an otherwise serious feminist blog.
As with thinking about sexual dysfunction in terms of disability, this is something that’s very new even to me, and something I’d appreciate feedback on.
8 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
-
Recent Posts
- A break in the clouds of depression
- I lost 8 months to depression and all I got was this lousy blog post
- Is this thing on? What I’ve been up to
- What is this war on women you speak of, and why should I care?
- The almighty glass of wine
- Pleasurists edition 166
- Book review: The Adventurous Couple’s Guide to Strap-On Sex
- The (slightly late) 2011 retrospective post
- Aren’t tax returns *Fun*?
- Where are all the good advice columnists?
- Questions about Vulvanomics
- Feminists with FSD does Orgasm, Inc.
- Doctors debate dyspareunia part 4: The debate continues
- Happy 3rd birthday, Feminists with FSD
- Doctors debate dyspareunia part 3: Pain’s validity, con’t
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (5)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (4)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (6)
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (8)
- July 2010 (8)
- June 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (9)
- April 2010 (7)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (8)
- January 2010 (11)
- December 2009 (11)
- November 2009 (6)
- October 2009 (10)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (11)
- July 2009 (11)
- June 2009 (6)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (4)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (2)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (1)
- 20/20 academia amazon animals asexuality BDSM blogging body image books communication depression dilators disability emotions experts fashion female sexual dysfunction Feminism feminism friday flibanserin FSD guest post health HSDD humor identity internet interstitial cystitis introspective journals kink language little help from my friends love marketing media medicine movies news NVA objectification pain physical therapy picture post pornography psychology relationships research restless genital syndrome reviews school sex sex education sex is not a natural act sexology sex therapy sex toys sexual dysfunction sexual health Sexuality social construction surgery surrogates television TMI vaginas vaginismus vaginitis Valentine's day vibrators vulvar vestibulitis vulvas vulvodynia what yeast infection
A lot of links
Feminism
- AngryBlackBitch
- Astrid's Journal
- Bird of Paradox
- Boiling Point Blog
- Deeply Problematic
- Echidne of the Snakes
- fBomb
- Female Impersonator
- Feminist Finance
- Feminist Majority Foundation
- Feminist Whore
- Feministe
- Feminists for Free Expression
- Finally, a Feminism 101 Blog
- Fuck Yeah, Gender Studies!
- FWD/Forward
- Gender Across Borders
- Girl with Pen
- ham blog
- Hoyden About Town
- Jezebel
- Kittywampus
- Love Letters in Hell
- Man Boobz
- Miss Mary Max
- Mom's Tinfoil Hat
- Ms. Marx – On Pop Culture
- My OB said WHAT?!?
- Notes for a Feminist Rebellion
- Questioning Transphobia
- Shakesville
- The Angry Black Woman
- The Curvature
- The F Word
- Tiger Beatdown
- Women's Glib
Feminism & Sexuality
- A Femanist View
- Annie Sprinkle’s Site – NSFW
- Bound, not Gagged
- Clarisse Thorn
- FigLeaf’s Real Adult Sex
- Livejournal: feminist_sex
- Love Bites: Clarisse Thorn
- Oh My God, That Britni's Shameless
- The Pervocracy
- The Sexual Freedom Daily
- Twanna A. Hines @ FUNKY BROWN CHICK
- VDay
- Waking Vixen
- Yes Means Yes Blog
Interesting posts
- “I am fighting for my sex life” article @ BBC News
- A (Chronic) Pain in the Vadge @ Feministing
- Battlepanda
- Campaign Tackles Women’s Chronic Pain–But There’s a LONG Way to Go
- From Painful Sex to Pleasurable Sex @ Babeland
- Lichens Sclerosus, My Story
- Men’s Guide to Vulvodynia
- More Riba Rambles on FSD
- Riba Rambles’ on FSD
- Sex Pain: Millions of Women Have It
- Too Young for Sexual Pain?
- Trouble Down There
- Vulvodynia Article @ New York Times
- When Painful Sex Is Something Serious
Living with Vulvar Pain blogs
- "down there"
- 1 X happypelvis wanted
- Almost Touching
- Attack of the 5'11"ish Woman
- Broken
- Busalbutterfly’s Blog
- Busted Bajingo
- Christians with Vulvodynia
- Chronic Healing
- Coping with VVD/VVS
- Daily Life with Pudendal Neuralgia
- Dealing with pain and dysfunction
- Dear Vagina, Why so Blue?
- Dilator in my Dishwasher
- Hanson’s Blog
- Hymen-what?
- If my penis hurt, there would be a pill
- Life with Vulvodynia
- Living with Vaginismus
- Living with vulvar vestibulitis
- Living with Vulvodynia: Living with Chronic Nerve Pain
- Mad Peach
- Minority Report
- my battle with vaginismus
- My Happy Place is Sad
- My Vajay-Jay is Broken
- Natalie’s Blog
- O'Keefe on Fire: Living with Vulvodynia
- our quiet hope
- Pain In The Mom
- Pelvic Pain Support
- Plugged
- Servicing the Chassis
- The 3 Amigos -Vulvar Vestibilitis-PFD-IC
- The Adventures of a 29 Year Old Virgin… Who's not that innocent!!!
- The Broken V
- The Vagina Dialogues
- Unconsummated
- Vaginismus Awareness
Oldies but goodies / Archives only
- abyss2hope
- Bad Moon Rising
- Bitchy Jones's Diary
- Carnival Against Sexual Violence
- Feminist Carnival of Sexual Freedom and Autonomy
- Feminist Review
- Fetch Me My Axe
- I shame the matriarchy
- Let them Eat Pro-SM Feminist Safe Spaces
- SexAbility
- The Carnival of Feminists
- The Second Awakening
- The Sexist
- WomenGamers
Resources
- American Association of Sexuality Educators Counselors and Therapists
- APTA.org – Find a Physical Therapist
- Campaign to End Chronic Pain in Women
- Cure Together – Vulvodynia
- Dr. Glazer’s Vulvodynia.com
- Femalepatient
- FSD Info
- Go Ask Alice!
- International Pelvic Pain Society
- International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD)
- Livejournal: vaginapagina
- National Coalition for Sexual Freedom
- National Vulvodynia Association
- ObGyn.net
- OurGyn.com
- Pudendal Help
- Scarleteen
- The Centers for VulvoVaginal Disorders
- The women’s sexual health foundation
- The-Clitoris.com
- Vaginismus Awareness Network
- Vulvar Health Awareness Campaign
- Vulvar Pain Foundation
- Vulvar Pain Society
- Vulvodynia @ Research on women’s health @ NIH
- Vulvodynia Support
- Women's Health News
- Women’s Therapy Center
Sexuality
Social Justice
- Can? We? Save? Africa?
- Derailing for Dummies
- Fuck Yeah, Privilege Denying Dude!
- Genderbitch: Words Of A Trans Girl
- hollaback!
- Queers United
- Racialicious
- RH Reality Check
- SAFER: Students Active For Ending Rape
- Tales from the God Emperor of Rome
- The Spoonie Daily
- this ain't livin'
- Trinityva @ livejournal
- What Tami Said
- Womanist Musings
- Yo is this racist?
Support Groups
- Livejournal: vaginismus
- Livejournal: vvs_community
- MySpace.com: Vulvodynia Awareness
- National Lichens Sclerosus Support Group
- PSAS Support
- Vulvar Vestibulitis Support Network
- Yahoo! Groups: Happy Pelvis
- Yahoo! Groups: Lichens Sclerosus
- Yahoo! Groups: Lichens Sclerosus (Deutschland)
- Yahoo! Groups: Shore Vulvodynia Support Group
- Yahoo! Groups: Vaginismus
- Yahoo! Groups: Vulvar Disorders
- Yahoo! Groups: Vulvodynia
-
© K and FeministsWithFSD, 2008 - 2011. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to K (or post author) and FeministsWithFSD with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
The discussions & information on this site are not medical in nature and should not be substituted for medical advice from a trained professional. This site is not intended to diagnose, treat, or cure any problems.
My e-mail address is private. Leave a comment (comments from new visitors are auto-screened by default) to get in touch with me.
Twitter Feed
Tweets by femswfsd
I didn’t think this post was going to pertain to me personally until I saw endometriosis listed in the fifth tier. I hadn’t thought of that as a sexual issue despite the fact that, you know, it entirely involves my reproductive organs.
This little problem has caused me years of intense pain, going from one doctor to another, desperate for succor. After nine years one offered to do surgery. She cut me open and lasered off the endometriosis that she could see. It has not stopped the pain, but it might have, and no other doctor was even willing to tell me that surgery was an option. Not to mention that endometriosis affects my chances of getting pregnant. Was any doctor going to tell me about that? Not until this year.
With the exception of the two women who are treating me now, taking my pain seriously, I really hate doctors.
Comment by Palaverer— 01/12/2011 #
Endo might not be a sexual issue all of the time but for some folks it is. brigid wrote about how it is for her, so, it’ll happen like that sometimes.
Comment by K— 01/15/2011 #
Hi. I just discovered your blog, and I’ve really been enjoying reading it. This was a great post.
Even within the categories, I’ve noticed there are some weird hierarchies. I have primary vaginismus, which I never really sought treatment for because…well, you know the old “Doctor, doctor, why does it hurt when I do this?” joke? Yeah. So, I never used tampons, never did the P-in-V sex, and that made it pretty easy never to think about it much at all.
Except for one thing, of course.
The gynecologist.
The dreaded, dreaded gynecologist. An issue I simply avoided for decades, ever since that first awful experience at college when that speculum simply Would Not Go In, and the asshole gynecologist I was seeing at the student health clinic wouldn’t tell me the reason why. (He told me to seek counseling, and come back to see him when I was “better.” This was, as I’m sure you can imagine, fairly mystifying to me at the time, as I’d never even heard of vaginismus, didn’t really understand why the exam had been unsuccessful or why it had hurt so much, and had no idea why I was supposed to be “crazy” just because he apparently couldn’t do his job.)
But then I hit my 40s and decided that it was really stupid for me to continue putting my health at risk just because I couldn’t do a pelvic exam, and that therefore maybe it was time to see if something could be done about the vagina problem. I went to the gynecologist and got a recommendation to see a physical therapist who specializes in vaginismus, with whom I had the following exchange:
HER: When did you first experience vulvar pain?
ME: The first time I tried to use a tampon, which was when I was 16.
HER: How much vulvar pain have you experienced in the last week?
ME: Um…none?
HER: How much vulvar pain have you experienced in the last month?
ME: None. Look, like I told you, it only hurts when I try to insert something, which I haven’t done in years. So…
HER: How many times a week do you experience vulvar pain?
ME: Um. I…well, I don’t, really. So zero, I guess.
HER: Look, you have to say that you have some vulvar pain. Otherwise, I can’t put anything down for the insurance.
ME: Can’t you just say vaginismus?
HER: No, vaginismus isn’t recognized as a medical issue. I have to say that you have vulvodynia.
ME: Oh. ::thinks:: Well, okay. I have no idea, then. Why don’t you just put down whatever you think sounds good, all right?
HER: All right.
So now I have a diagnosis of vulvodynia, even though I don’t have a problem with chronic vulvar pain at all. It makes me feel guilty every time I see it on my medical records. I only wanted to be able to get a pap smear! How was this “not a medical issue?”
Comment by afartherroom— 01/15/2011 #
Hmmm, Hierarchies within hierarchies. I can see how that would work but it’s still unfair.
I’m surprised the PT’s first inclination was to diagnose with vulvodynia for insurance purposes. My medical receipts, some of them say something about pelvic floor dysfunction – which is right for me since my muscles are all screwey. However I’m not 100% clear on whether vaginismus is the same thing as pelvic floor dysfunction. It sounds like that would be a better fit than vulvodynia though.
Comment by K— 01/15/2011 #
[…] The sexual dysfunction hierarchyJanuary 30th, 2011 @ 6:37 pm Another great post from Feminists With Female Sexual Dysfunction: […]
Pingback by Love Bites: Clarisse Thorn | Time Out Chicago » » The sexual dysfunction hierarchy— 01/30/2011 #
[…] I interpret the idea that pain is a sexual dysfunction, and the only valid one, as maintaining a sexual dysfunction hierarchy. It elevates physical pain above all others. My problem matters; yours doesn’t. My physical […]
Pingback by Doctors debate dyspareunia part 2: Is pain the only valid FSD? « Feminists with Female Sexual Dysfunction— 08/17/2011 #
[…] is the only valid & important female sexual dysfunction, (a problematic statement with which I disagree,) Orgasm, Inc. doesn’t talk about it. How painful sex fits in with the critique of sexual […]
Pingback by Feminists with FSD does Orgasm, Inc. « Feminists with Female Sexual Dysfunction— 10/12/2011 #
[…] Conceptualizing the FSD hierarchy – So if dyspareunia is the one true sexual dysfunction, then what about every other kind of sexual […]
Pingback by The (slightly late) 2011 retrospective post « Feminists with Female Sexual Dysfunction— 01/19/2012 #